Post your comments here, with at least three arguments to support your opinion
After considering the art´s definition, purposes and reasons studied in class, look at the following video and set your arguments to be on Sue Sheridan´s side or against her, explaining if you consider her work as artistic or not. Post your comments here, with at least three arguments to support your opinion
Merci Gutiérrez Glez.
8/31/2014 04:28:55 am
This video explains a short and slightly nervous point explaining how the woman's particular photos of lights can be visible in a variety of ways. I think this is amazing, because we all have different perspectives about art and we need to respect them.
Merci Gutiérrez Glez.
9/6/2014 06:47:51 am
1. She delivers a short and slightly nervous point of view, so this is very interesting, because she is seeing art as figures and lines. 9/3/2014 05:36:22 am
I´m againts her ´cause: 9/9/2014 03:28:12 am
This video explains a short point of view explainig the delicated subject about what the photos are. The woman explains her own ideas of the paintings 9/11/2014 03:35:07 am
I'm against her because of the following arguments:
Meilyn Gamboa R.
9/11/2014 03:43:07 am
1. Im against her because she didnt use an establishet tecnic.
alberto pérez
9/12/2014 12:04:04 am
the video was interesting because first of all from the bign to the end Sue thought that the thing she did were art and i'm going to explain that they aren't in 4 point: 9/12/2014 12:44:12 am
1.-One of the principal things that we studied in class, was that a painting always need to have the formula purpose vs result, for me,Sue doesnt have any purpose. 9/12/2014 01:26:38 am
I think her work is artisctic, but she isn't a great artist because her paintings are not too dificult and she sold them at a very high price. Los comentarios están cerrados.
|
Rosy bremont
I have been in Tecnológico de Monterrey since 2000. I have a Graphic designer bachelor and a Master degree in Visual arts and Education Archives
Septiembre 2014
Categories |